The Players:
- Tucker: a 27 year old nurse. Loves zip up hoodies and ballet flats.
- Andy: a 25 year old architectural designer. Loves red lipstick and mid-century furniture.
- Abby: a 24 year old fundraising rockstar. Loves micro brews and new restaurants.
- Georgina: a 25 year old fund development extraordinaire. Loves high heels and a good Sour Patch Kid.
Here we are, ten, fifteen years later, and we still have not been "snapped up". Generally satisfied with our lives - friends, families, and jobs - we're just looking for someone to share it with. Or at the very least, someone to fill the time - other than pets (read: a cat).
The Game:
This is where our little "experiment" comes in: for the next three months, four roommates will get on two different online dating sites...for one ultimate goal.
FINDING OUR HUSBANDS.
No, only kidding. One Giant Experiment. We want to see if, with Dr. Neil Clark Warren, you actually do "experience a difference". We want to see if it really is "okay to just look".
Some initial impressions on both sites:
- eHarmony moves a lot slower than Match. Abby and Georgina are both on eHarmony, and are still in just the initial communication stages. It seems pretty intentional to actually "start communication" with someone. It also seems pretty harsh to "end communication". For me, I received a closed message from a guy who said he wished to end communication with me because he was pursuing another relationship. Although we had never even exchanged "first questions" I still went "hmph" a little and took it personally.
- Match has more of a "meet at a bar" feel. You're able to search through hundreds of guys in order to find one who is visually appealing to you. They do, however, send five daily matches which you are able to sift through. Also, they have an email component which both Tucker and Andy have been utilizing already...and on top of that there is an IM feature. Feedback from this feature is that it is kind of annoying.
Stay tuned for Saturday's post. Andy has her first date with a match guy, and if past dating experiences foreshadow anything...it should be a doozy.
*Names changed from our own to our past (or current) favorite pet. So...we're not really protecting their identities...
DISCLAIMER: While this experiment is funny and we may from time to time poke fun at some of the dates we go on, this is not to falsely misuse any sort of social network and is entirely malice free. We are simply four girls who have tried everything else - it's the grapefruit diet of dating.
Abolutely exstatic to follow along on your jouney!!! Go get 'em!!
ReplyDeleteOh sweet mercy.
ReplyDeleteTHIS? Is going to be phenomenal.
Match vs. eHarmony comparison?
ReplyDeleteIt is like to compare an apple with an orange.
Match is an
Online Dating 1.0: First Generation "Browsing/Searching Options, Powerful Searching Engine"
or
Online Dating 2.0: Second Generation "Matching based on Self-Reported Data / Bidirectional Recommendation Engine"
Match is more suitable for fun dating, for instant gratification.
eHarmony is an Online Dating 3.0: Third Generation "Compatibility Matching Algorithm"
eHarmony, uses a normative version of the Big5 to assess personality and Dyadic Adjustment Scale to calculate compatibility.
The score for the U.S. questionnaire is different from the UK site, Australian site, Canadian site, etc.
eHarmony is intended for serious dating.
Anyway, if you compare Match and eHarmony, [using Match for serious dating], my bet is you are going to find “the online dating sound barrier”.
Matching based on Self-Reported Data / Bidirectional Recommendation Engines (Collaborative Filtering) will always be in the range of 3 or 4 persons "recommended" per 1,000 persons screened, in exactly the same range of searching on one's own.
Compatibility Matching Algorithms used by actual online dating sites (with Big-5 Model or a proprietary model like the ones used by Perfectmatch or Chemistry), are in the range of 3 or 4 persons "highly compatible" per 1,000 persons screened, in exactly the same range of searching on one's own.
Success Rates of those sites are less than 10%. The majority of their members are not going to achieve a long term relationship with commitment (or marriage).
Regards.
Fernando Ardenghi.
Buenos Aires.
Argentina.
ardenghifer@gmail.com